Pages

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Found in the NY Times


Photo by Lambert Orkis


Interesting week:

11 comments:

  1. "suddenly these just extremely simplistic, user-friendly, lightweight, sort of music lite," he said. "People are winning Pulitzer Prizes writing this stuff now."

    Hello Mr. Pot, I'd like you to meet Mr. Kettle, you have a color in common.

    Nice rant by DJA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Adams: An internecine skirmish breaks out amongst the Tonalist troops in the Style Wars. A fragging, even.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adams is not a simplistic composer, and never has been. Just because a charge is untrue when said of him, doesn't mean that it cannot be true of others.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It certainly could be true. If only he'd tell us who he's talking about!

    ReplyDelete
  5. David Lang? In that case, I'd be at least halfway minded to agree.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, he didn't say!

    The only Lang I know is Little Match Girl Passion, which is gorgeous and not at all simple or simple-minded.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ...much better if that had stayed lost in The Times.

    I mean, has he forgotten how the marketing department at Nonesuch knocked La Monte Young out of the minimal quartet, putting Adams in alongside Riley, Reich, and Glass?

    ReplyDelete
  8. He did say, and not very far between the lines, either.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hmm. Looking over the list of Pulitzer winners, I realize I don't know that many of them, so I cannot personally assume or guess that it's Lang, especially given my own view of Lang's Pulitzer winner.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Carter was right. Adams is truly awful. Strange, though: I once saw them chatting amicably at Zenkel Hall.

    ReplyDelete

This blog is moderated, so don't worry if your comment doesn't appear immediately. If I'm asleep, working, or at a concert, it'll take a while.