Political Violence

I'm generally opposed to political violence, with some exceptions, like the overthrow of an oppressive government by the people (the American Revolution). Last year I wrote a blog post shaking my head at the number of people saying that political violence "isn't who [Americans] are." Gosh, political violence has been with us for centuries, practiced by individuals and the government. Right now, we've basically got secret police rounding people up based on skin color and their ability to speak Spanish. That's government-sponsored political violence and the Supreme Court is letting the government get away with it.

Today, Charlie Kirk, a right-wing political figure, was assassinated during an appearance in Utah. I wanted to take note of a few things he said in the last few years.

In October, 2022, Rolling Stone quoted him as follows:

Republicans usually tout a “tough on crime” stance, but right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk thinks a man who is set to be charged with attempted homicide should be allowed out on bail.

“Why has he not been bailed out?” Kirk said Monday on his podcast of the man who allegedly beat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi‘s husband Paul with a hammer last Friday. “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out, I bet his bail’s like thirty or forty thousand bucks.” With a smirk, he added: “Bail him out and then go ask him some questions.”

It sounds like he was okay with violence against Paul Pelosi. 

This past June, when Melissa Hortman, a Democratic politician, was assassinated in her home, along with her husband and their dog, the BBC noted the following:

In the wake of the attacks, several of Trump's top supporters and allies - including Utah Senator Mike Lee, Elon Musk, conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer and activist Charlie Kirk - attempted without evidence to link Walz and Democratic lawmakers to the killings.

Lastly, Kirk believed that some gun deaths were inevitable and the price you pay for having the Second Amendment:

"You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death," Kirk said at a Turning Point USA Faith event on Wednesday, as reported by Media Matters for America. "That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am—I think it's worth it.

"I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe."

We have the First Amendment, giving people basically the right to say whatever drivel they want. Kirk certainly took advantage of it, and now he's a victim of political violence himself.

Democrats almost uniformly condemn political violence, regardless of the political beliefs of the target. Charlie Kirk did not.