Around the blogosphere, many fine postings:
- Gavin Plumley has been following the composer's footsteps around Austria and posting daily about Mahler's last days.
- Alex Ross has had several postings.
- Matthew Guerrieri presents another installment of Strauss & Mahler.
- Steve Hicken on Mahler and risk-taking in music.
I heard Michael Tilson Thomas and the San Francisco Symphony perform Mahler's Second and Sixth Symphonies the other week; they're now touring Europe with those and the Ninth.
You might read Henry-Louis De La Grange's enormous Mahler biography, or Alma Mahler's And the Bridge is Love. And be sure to listen to Tom Lehrer's "Alma," which was my long-ago introduction to Mahler ("Composer of Das Lied von der Erde and other light classics," as Lehrer described him in the spoken introduction to the song).
17 comments:
I love how, in his spoken introduction to that song, Lehrer carefully lays the groundwork for his rhymes by letting us know that Mahler wrote a work called Das Lied von der Erde. That was before the big Mahler boom and I don't think he'd have to take the same precaution these days.
The song is total genius, and I have to now admit that I read And the Bridge is Love before I ever heard a note of Mahler.
I did eventually get the joke about "Composer of 'Das Lied von der Erde' and other light classics," of course.
Having read And the Bridge is Love makes you sound like an incredibly dedicated Mahler completist!
Am I correct in guessing that the book is what we might call "a total hoot"?
Hahahaha. Yes on a total hoot. I read it in high school, when I was more easily shocked than I am now. She makes it quite clear who she was screwing when. Mahler: before the wedding, of course.
NO on completist! I haven't read ANY Mahler bios or even heard all of the symphonies! (I'm working on remedying that.)
But that's the beauty of it -- it makes you *sound* like a completist, even if you aren't.
It would be kind of difficult to hear all the symphonies live, even with MTT and the SFS in the neighborhood.
Note that there was NO qualification when I wrote "or even heard all of the symphonies."
I've heard 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, of which 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 were live. Never heard 1 live, I believe. The remainders (3, 5, 9, 10) I do not know at all.
I did note that, but wasn't sure if there was an implicit qualification (the way I talk about "operas I've seen" and I usually mean "live").
So will I be seeing you at SF Symphony's Mahler 3 next season?
Oh....probably. :)
I've heard 1-4, 9, and Das Lied live. The first four were varying degrees of tolerable, annoying, and actually good. 9 drove me up the wall. Das Lied I'd do physical injury if I were forced to listen to it again.
So we know how much you know of Gustav; how about Walter and Franz?
Your opinion of Mahler is not exactly a secret. :) I found myself wondering if your feelings about both Mahler and Rothko represent something consistent in your aesthetic preferences: a strong preference for immediacy as opposed to process.
P. S. I know a lot more Gropius, and a lot more about Gropius, than Werfel.
No, I think the difference is that I prefer structure and coherence. "Immediacy" is not the first preference that comes to mind to describe someone who loves Bruckner, or could sit and listen to Steve Reich all day. Mahler's lack of structure and coherence are so extreme that his fans consider it not a bug but a feature, as illustrated by MTT as referred to in the post you linked to.
Well, one listner's incoherence is another's ellipticality (coin!).
And immediacy is one of the first thinhs I think of when I think of Mr. Reich.
Actually, I'm going to delete the above posting - I see that this is a basically-unused Google account, and you sound like the Pelleastrian.
And also because if you'd followed the link above, you'd know that Kalimac isn't going to change his mind on Mahler on someone else's say so.
Post a Comment